查看原文
其他

New QFII/RQFII Legislations for Consultation

Sandra Lu 通力律师 2022-04-08

By Sandra Lu | Lily Luo

When the SAFE announced the expansion of total QFII quota from USD150 billion to USD300 billion on 14 January 2019, market inferred that there might be some moves of the long-awaited QFII, RQFII amended rules. It comes as expected but with an unexpected leap forward.

Highlights

Measures” refers to the Measures for the Administration of Domestic Securities and Futures Investment by Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors and RMB Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors (Consultation Paper) issued by the CSRC on 31 January 2019.

Provisions” refers to the Provisions on Issues Concerning the Implementation of the Measures for the Administration of Domestic Securities and Futures Investment by Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors and RMB Qualified Foreign Institutional Investors (Consultation Paper) issued by the CSRC on 31 January 2019.


I.  Providing a huge boost to WFOE PFM business


1.  Seeding PFM fund products

According to Paragraph 3 of Article 6 of the Provisions, privately-raised securities investment funds of which underlying investments are standardized financial instruments (e.g. stocks, bonds, publicly-offered funds, exchange-traded securities, financial derivatives, commodities futures, options, and foreign exchange derivatives) are newly included to the permissible investment scope of QFIIs/RQFIIs. It is of great significance to WFOE PFMs. Funds sourced from QFIIs/RQFIIs can be utilized as seed money to sponsor the establishment of PFM funds. Particularly, it may release the pressure of meeting the AMAC’s requirement to successfully raise money and launch.
 
the 1st PFM fund within 6 months since the completion of AMAC registration, solve the immediate lack of local distribution resources, and facilitate a WFOE PFM to build up investment track records for its development of PFM business and further for publicly-offered fund management business initiative in China.


Having said that, the mechanism of well handling conflict of interest should be in place as to a QFII/RQFII if the money is sourced from the fund products, client mandates it manages, rather than its proprietary money.

2.  Obtaining revenue from providing investment advisory service

Currently, WFOE PFMs are only allowed to provide research support and sharing through intra-group transfer pricing arrangement. According to Paragraph 5 of Article 6 of the Provisions, a QFII/RQFII can appoint its affiliated WFOE PFM as the non-discretionary investment advisor for its investment in Chinese securities and futures. As such, a WFOE PFM can get business revenue to reduce its financial pressure, effectively leverage the investment capability of local team and well coordinate group resources.

We understand that WFOE PFM’s acting as the investment advisor to the affiliated QFII/RQFII is not subject to the “1+3+3” criteria requirement (i.e. one-year PFM registration status, AMAC membership, three investment management personnel with at least 3-year consecutive securities and/or futures investment experience). From legislative perspective, “1+3+3” is applicable to investment advisory service to privately-raised asset management schemes launched by local financial institutions or their asset management subsidiaries. Paragraph 5 of Article 6 of the Provisions, without specific criteria requirements other than the affiliated relationship, can be the legal basis for a WFOE PFM to provide investment advisory service to its affiliated QFII/RQFII.

On one side, the above business facilities serve for providing better China solutions for global asset management institutions on top of close cooperation and better coordination of resources at the group level, and thus encouraging more foreign asset management institutions to set up WFOE PFMs; on the other side, it enhances the attractiveness to QFIIs/RQFIIs, optimizes the investor structure of Chinese securities market and stimulates vitality of the market.


II.  Revising and consolidating QFII Measures, RQFII Measures and their supporting rules


The CSRC creatively merges QFII scheme and RQFII scheme. Going forward, the CSRC’s regulation on QFIIs and RQFIIs becomes unified. For example, (1) one application can seek both QFII and RQFII license, except that the home jurisdiction of the applicant has not yet obtained RQFII overall quota; (2) the AUM requirement for a QFII applicant has been removed; (3) types of RQFII holders will be no longer limited to asset management institutions, instead, it extends to the same types of QFII holders, i.e. foreign fund management institutions, commercial banks, insurance companies, securities companies, futures companies, trust companies, government investment management companies and other assets management institutions, as well as other types of institutional investors recognized by the CSRC such as pension funds, charity funds and endowment funds.

We also note that the CSRC has consolidated most of the rules, notices, regulatory approaches it has issued in the past few years for QFIIs/RQFIIs into the Measures and the Provisions. It really does good to explicitly implement QFII/RQFII rules and help the market get clear understanding about the legal and regulatory requirements.


III.  Expanding investment scope


The investment scope of QFIIs/RQFIIs is significantly expanded.



IIV.  Strengthening the see-through regulation and further clarifying the ownership issue


In Article 5 of the Provisions, it further clarifies that the client assets of a QFII/RQFII belong to the client and are segregated from the QFII/RQFII and the PRC custodian. If the securities account is named as “QFII/RQFII + client funds” in general rather than embodying the specific name of the client, the QFII/RQFII must separately open sub-accounts thereunder for each fund and product according to the rules of the securities depository and clearing institution and the futures market monitoring institutions, and verify the identities of end investors of such funds and products on a see-through basis, and quarterly report the information of end investors through the PRC custodian.


V.  Relaxing the management of PRC Custodian


The licensing requirement of PRC custodian is removed and only pre-filing towards the CSRC within 5 business days of the first-time signing of a custodian agreement with a QFII/RQFII (i.e. the initiation of PRC custodian business) is required.

Previously, a QFII can only appoint one PRC custodian, and an RQFII can only appoint no more than three PRC custodians. Such amount limit is removed. In the case of having two or more PRC custodians, the QFII/RQFII must designate one of them as the principal PRC custodian to take charge of license and quota application, reporting, information registration, etc.

The CSRC is soliciting public comments on the Measures and the Provisions until 2 March 2019. If you have any comment or suggestion, please do not hesitate to let us know. We are happy to discuss and formulate a comprehensive paper for submission before the deadline.



Authors:


>


Sandra Lu

Lawyer Partner

Llinks Law Offices


>


Lily Luo

Lawyer | Partner

Llinks Law Offices


✎ 往期分享



通力法评 | 公募基金新增风险管理工具: 信用衍生品
通力法评 | 商业银行理财产品治理的法律分析(更新)
通力法评 | 中国证监会私募资管业务实施细则要点简评
通力法评 | 规范证券公司大集合资产管理业务之路径分析
通力法评 | AMAC就香港机构投顾服务发布备案要求(中文版)
通力法评 | AMAC就香港机构投顾服务发布备案要求(英文版)

长按下图识别二维码关注我们


© 通力律师事务所

本微信所刊登的文章仅代表作者本人观点, 不代表通力律师事务所的法律意见或建议。我们明示不对任何依赖该等文章的任何内容而采取或不采取行动所导致的后果承担责任。如需转载或引用该等文章的任何内容, 请注明出处。

您可能也对以下帖子感兴趣

文章有问题?点此查看未经处理的缓存